Photo by Jaredd Craig on Unsplash
The topic of openness in science and education is becoming increasingly relevant in today’s society. While the benefits are clear, I also have my doubts and dilemmas about how to explore this new landscape. It’s not just about increased access to information and accelerated scientific progress, but also about the potential challenges and ethical considerations that come with it. Openness in science and education has the potential to be both beneficial and challenging. On one hand, it can facilitate innovation, support lifelong learning, and break down barriers. Increasing access to scientific data and information can have a significant impact on the pace of scientific progress and discovery. Openness can also facilitate greater access to education, encouraging learning and the sharing of knowledge. Additionally, it can promote transparency and accountability within the scientific community, leading to greater trust and credibility. However, it is important to consider the potential risks of openness, as they cannot be ignored. There are ethical considerations such as issues of privacy and confidentiality, as well as the potential for exploitation and misuse of scientific knowledge. How do we ensure that openness remains a force for good, rather than a source of confusion and misinformation? Is it possible to create a society that promotes a culture of responsibility and accountability, grounded in principles of transparency and ethical conduct?
The concept of openness reminds me of a vast library system, with each book representing a piece of knowledge waiting to be discovered. Some libraries are private, accessible only to a selected few, while others are public, open to everyone who wants to explore their shelves. I remember spending hours lost in my local library as a child. Browsing the sea of books was exciting, yet a touch intimidating. This experience perfectly describes how I view openness in science and education – a vast and astonishing library teeming with knowledge.
In the past, scientific knowledge was often guarded within the walls of private libraries, accessible only to the privileged few who held the keys. Exclusive spaces for knowledge-sharing can create a sense of elitism and celebrate inequalities, restricting the free flow of ideas. Open science challenges this by removing barriers and inviting everyone to take part in the pursuit of knowledge. The goal is to create an environment that welcomes the exchange of ideas and promotes the advancement of knowledge.
I believe researchers and educators must curate and evaluate the information in the domain of open science, just as librarians do with the collections in libraries. Developing critical thinking, information literacy, and ethical understanding are essential for gaining knowledge and understanding. As educators, we have a significant responsibility to share information freely and openly. We must also ensure that the content we share is accurate, complete, and up-to-date and that readers can evaluate the information and use it responsibly. In addition, we should be aware of the risks associated with the use of information, such as plagiarism, mishandling of data, and the spread of misinformation. To ensure science and education are accessible, we must prioritize truth, fairness, and inclusivity. To foster openness in science and education, it is important to provide students with the necessary skills to explore the vast information landscape. This includes developing their critical thinking abilities, teaching them how to assess sources, differentiate between fact and opinion, and promoting responsible participation in scientific research. In this way, we can promote collaboration, innovation, and progress by fostering a culture of openness.
In conclusion, although promoting openness in science and education poses some challenges, the benefits are clearly visible. It speeds up progress, creates a shared space for learning and growth, and encourages collaboration among researchers and scientists. By embracing openness and working together to follow the rules, we can maximize the full potential of science and education, creating a more informed and curious society, and building a better future for all.
Sources:
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Hafiz Muhammad, Adil., Anjum, Shahbaz., Sultan, Mussarat., Ashiq, Murtaza & Rafiq, Muhammad, (2022). Open education resources’ benefits and challenges in the academic world: a systematic review. Global Knowledge Memory and Communication 73(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0049
Johanna Karlsson says:
Thank you for your text! I like your comparison with libraries, and I experience it the same way as you do.
March 21, 2024 — 2:23 pm
Vesna Bulatović says:
Thank you Johanna for your comment!
April 6, 2024 — 2:18 pm
Jonathan Lian says:
Hi Vesna, I like the analogy of the library system that you used as I enjoy going to libraries and bookshops to immerse myself in the curated collections of physical books. The post was a good presentation of the balance and also the tension between the benefits and the risks of openness in science and education. JL
March 30, 2024 — 5:40 am
Vesna Bulatović says:
Thank you JL for your comment!
April 6, 2024 — 2:18 pm
Susan Lee says:
Thank you for sharing, I like the analogy of the expansive library too. Democratising learning through sharing of knowledge and information could bring progress to an area of study more efficiently. Learning and communicating learning and teaching can be collaborative on a global scale.
And yes, critical thinking and curation are key to the selection and sharing. These are skills students need to acquire too because they are facing a very different challenge than before – they have access to too much information. They need skills, strong foundational knowledge to filter and select, as well as identify and contextualise information for their purpose. I think previously, sometimes we faced the challenge of a lack of access.
So the learning and teaching journey needs to shift too, to embrace information selection, ethical and thoughtful use, and leveraging of technological tools like generative AI, to journey with the students in the new landscape of education.
April 1, 2024 — 6:21 am
Vesna Bulatović says:
Thank you Susan for your comment! I agree with you that learning and teaching journey needs to change, to embrace information selection, ethical and thoughtful use of technological tools like generative AI.
April 6, 2024 — 2:17 pm